Home > Dr Naik > ”Numerous comments made by Dr Naik are evidence to me of his unacceptable behavior,” May, Home Secretary of Brition on Naik. ( Part 3 on How Correct How Wrong is Dr Zakir Naik )

”Numerous comments made by Dr Naik are evidence to me of his unacceptable behavior,” May, Home Secretary of Brition on Naik. ( Part 3 on How Correct How Wrong is Dr Zakir Naik )


Conservative Home Secretary (interior minister) Theresa May said she had barred Zakir Naik, a 44-year-old television preacher based in Mumbai, for inflammatory remarks he was known to have made in the past. ”Numerous comments made by Dr Naik are evidence to me of his unacceptable behavior,” May said in a statement, without elaborating.

If we recall, on one of the channels of Indian English Electronic Media, Zakir Naik was heard saying the biggest terrorist today is George Bush; G W Bush was in office of power in America. when Zakir  spoke live on Tv.

Zakir Naik was also heard saying  in a Barkha Dutt Show recently on the issue of  Liberal or Fundamental   Muslims, the show  was actually aired to promote My Name is Khan movie  by another so called very liberal Muslim SRK.

Dr Naik in an answer to a question replied,   he neither agrees to accept Osama as terrorist nor was he in favor of absolving him of the allegation as there is no proof, of his involment in 9/11 this is what he thought.

Yet he was not  convinced Osama was involved in 9/11 Terror attack and he was even going to the extent of saying the conspiracy theories about the 9/11 and the videos and media material to support his point of view, which is available on the net and on you tube with hundreds of American’s giving many theories to proof otherwise which goes against the official stand taken by the USA Pentagon and US Govt.

It is also to be noted few months back, Mr. Naik was part of a resent in Shia Sect in Muslims for referring to one the Islamic leader and Commander of Army with respect calling him Razi Allah taala Anhu. And few in Muslims were annoyed with the way Mr. Naik simplified the postioning in one other Issue too, which triggered negative talk against him. which In my opinion could have been avoided.

British Govt allegations on  Zakir Naik and  rejection of Visa

“The Secretary of State has decided to exclude you from the UK for engaging in unacceptable behavior by making statements that attempt to justify terrorists and fostering hatred. There is no right to appeal against this decision”

Conservative Home Secretary (interior minister) Theresa May said she had barred Zakir Naik, a 44-year-old television preacher based in Mumbai, for inflammatory remarks he was known to have made in the past. ”Numerous comments made by Dr Naik are evidence to me of his unacceptable behavior,” May said in a statement, without elaborating.

Quote 2006 website footage had shown Naik telling Muslims it was acceptable to embrace terrorism in certain instances. And a report in media which said,  Naik said Muslims should beware of people saying Osama bin Laden was right or wrong, adding: “If you ask my view, if given the truth, if he is fighting the enemies of Islam, I am for him.

“If he is terrorizing the terrorists, if he is terrorizing America the terrorist, the biggest terrorist, every Muslim should be a terrorist.”

A Home Office spokesman said the powers were used if an individual expressed views that “foment, justify or glorify terrorist violence in furtherance of particular beliefs” or “seek to provoke others to terrorist acts”.

Naiks comments of Western Societies.  And Women.

He is also reported by the paper to have suggested Western women make themselves “more susceptible to rape” by wearing revealing clothing.

“Western society has actually degraded (women) to the status of concubines, mistresses and social butterflies, who are mere tools in the hands of pleasure seekers and sex marketers,” the paper quoted him as saying.

Legal View of Naiks Lawyer.

However, Nail’s lawyer contends that the statements referred to by the home secretary have been quoted out of context and they were made prior to 2008 after which he was granted a visa.

Why then was his VISA suddenly revoked in 2010?

Majeed Memon, Naik’s Lawyer said, “In 2008, he was granted visa, granting or denial of visa is a sovereign state’s discretion, but revoking it without any proper reason. That is not.

Categories: Dr Naik
  1. No comments yet.
  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: